A young bandit could lose his testing agreement That’s what we know

Atlanta – The trial of young longing can be canceled if the district prosecutor’s office of the Fulton County has its way.

The rapper, the legal name of which-juffy Lamar Williams, is accused of violating his agreement to stop his involvement in the YSL Rico trial after now issued a post to one of his accounts on social networks.

Previous History:

Williams, who found his guilt on October 31, 2024, was sentenced to a conditional term, including contact with victims or their families. Prosecutors now claim that he has violated these terms, strengthening the publications of social media aimed at a key witness to law enforcement agencies.

What do we know:

The prosecutors filed a request for the abolition of Williams’s testing, arguing that his activities on social networks threaten witnesses and state officials and posed a threat to the integrity of the judicial system.

What do they say:

During the submission on Wednesday to the Supreme Court, Fulton, George, asked Judge Page Witacker immediately to delay Williams in custody, arguing his constant freedom in the symbol “poses a clear and pointed danger to public safety and undermines the rule of law.”

The submission outlines a series of events that begin with a previous hearing of the gang murder, which now continue, in which the Fulton Marissa Ogoerito, Fulton, investigative district, testify. The court clearly forbade any video or a photo of Ogoerito during her testimony. However, the social media user, identified as a blogger, posted her image with the signature: “She does not want her to be shown on the screen? Well, here.”

In April, the day of the fool Williams noted the image in his account of social media, adding: “Marissa Ogoerito is the biggest liar in the DA office.” This publication has become viral, as reported, by gaining more than 2 million views and prompted the flood of comments, including threats to Ogoerito and her family. These publications on social networks were elongated

According to the movement, the loss has increased quickly. “The home’s home address and the home address of her parents were publicly posted,” prosecutors wrote, citing one position, which said, “If the hatred is really real, then pull her mother,” next to a photo of his mother’s house.

After hours, prosecutors claim that another position was a threat to the life of the district prosecutor Fulton Fani Willis. One user wrote: “Personally see that Fani Willis is killed.”

“Escalation from aiming evidence to create direct threats to death against the chosen district prosecutor of the Fulton County, is a grave and an unprecedented attack on the justice system,” the prosecutors said in the submission.

The state argued that Williams’s actions are part of a wider campaign “intimidation, harassment and misinformation”, designed to obstruct justice and silence of those involved in prolonged criminal proceedings.

The other side:

In his official account X, former Twitter, the young tight wrote the following:

“I’m not engaged in people with people, I’m a good person, I would never have been indulging anyone to anyone or, of course, to take part in a threat to anyone. I am all about peace and love.”

Dig deeper:

Court’s documents referred to additional attempts to manipulate public opinion, including references to social media to Judge Witaker as “YSL Whitaker”, a nod on a young gang Life slime, with which prosecutors claim that Williams are connected.

Georgia’s law allows you to cancel a conventional term if the defendant is involved in criminal behavior or actions that threaten public security. Prosecutors emphasized that “the significant influence of Williams on people around the world” increases the danger created by its actions.

“Failure to act is strongly only encouraged to threaten, persecute and intimidate those who participate in this case,” the submission reads.

Whats next:

The prosecutors also asked the court to be able to compensate for law enforcement agencies for additional safety measures taken in response to threats.

“The integrity of this court and the safety of those who participate in this prosecution were questioned,” the submission summed up. “The state calls on this court to take quick and decisive measures, withdrawing the deadline and not distracting it.”

That we don’t know:

The hearing date has not yet been set.

See Also:

Young Thugysl Trailnewscrime and Public Safety Responsibility