A grandmother in her 70s was hit by a hit-and-run car one after the other and was crushed…suspect’s suspect record (Transcript Y)

■ Host: Host Lee Se-na, Host Na Kyung-chul
■ Cast: Lawyer Song Soo Ho

* The text below may differ from the actual content of the broadcast, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify (YTN New Square 14:00) when bidding.

◇ Anchor> It was such a horrible and horrible accident. Recently, a 70-year-old grandmother in Busan was killed by a car not once, but twice, right?

◆Son Suho> That’s right. That was two days ago and it was horrible that happened around 5am on the 28th. It happened in Busan. An SUV drove by and hit the woman. And two minutes later, another SUV drove by and hit the woman. A citizen who watched reported this to the police. Unfortunately, a 70-year-old woman who was hit by two cars in a row eventually died. The police detained both within 10 hours after the accident. I caught him, and these drivers said that the pedestrian was not visible. And he claims that he did not beat the person, but ran away, although he knew about it, they say, he did not think that it was a person.

◇ Host> The driver who caused the accident for the first time was also found to have bought alcohol on purpose to hide his drunken driving, but according to some media reports, the traffic after the accident was suspicious.

◆Son Suho> This is very suspicious. Of course, we need to think more carefully about the purpose of this act. If you look at the traffic line, this is the result of a police investigation. The accident happened around 5 o’clock in the morning. Then I go to the company. So I go to work for the company and go to the store around 9am, about 4 hours later. It is approximately 1.3 km from work. I go to the mini market and buy things, and I eat them. I bought some soju and then went to work. It is very unusual to go back to the store and buy soju after work, and I have no choice but to suspect that this is an act to cover up my guilt.

◇ Anchor> There are probably many things that are suspicious, and another accident comes to mind. I don’t understand why I bought soju at 9 in the morning, but in the end the police suspect that they were trying to get drunk, that is, the so-called drunken method.

◆Son Suho> That’s right. Let’s split things up. First, around 9 o’clock, the driver bought soju from a store and then drank it himself. He claims to have been drinking. He claims that he drank half a bottle, but the police say that he did, but this is said to be unconfirmed. If you drank half a bottle of soju around 9am, as the driver claimed, it would be too embarrassing to calculate whether you had been drinking at the time of the accident and what your blood alcohol level was, even if you had. It becomes very difficult. I can’t rule out the possibility that he may have drunk half a bottle of soju for this, and he didn’t. Because if you claim that you didn’t actually drink it, you can also confuse the police investigation into the condition and circumstances of the time you were driving. In other words, according to his statement, he measured his blood alcohol level while drinking half a bottle of soju. I measured it, but it is known that it is not a license revocation, but a license suspension level. However, if you lied about drinking when you didn’t, the police will again be confused about your blood alcohol level when you were actually driving. I think they were buying alcohol at 9am or pretending to drink to hinder the police investigation.

◇Anchor> I mean, it’s a shame I’m psychotic, but I don’t have solid proof. First of all, the police are considering the arrest of two drivers who fled after the accident. How do you see the possibility of issuing it in real life?

◆Song Soo-ho> The most important thing to discover now is whether you are drunk and how drunk you were. Ma left the scene as it had been before after hitting and killing a person before deciding to get behind the wheel. In other words, it appears highly probable that the crime of escape from death, that is, the crime of escape from death under the Special Act, has been established. Of course, in order for this crime of escape to be established, you must know that you hit a person. Even though you knew it, it’s an offense that is only established when you leave the scene without assistance, so according to the current statements of these drivers, you didn’t know it was a person. Then we cannot rule out the possibility that it will not be established. Ma does a lot of these things from a police perspective, and he probably did it again. So if it’s a hit-and-run crime and the driver continues to deny the crime, I think that could be enough of an arrest warrant.

Excerpt from
: Lee Mi Young, Digital News Editor

#YRecord

※ “Your report becomes news”
(Kakao Talk) Search and add YTN channel
(Tel.) 02-398-8585
(Mail) [email protected]