Why Residents of Madhura Nagar Vs IAS Amoy Kumar

Hyderabad: IAS officer D Amoy Kumar, who was earlier working as District Collector of Ranga Reddy and Medchal Malkajgiri, is under the crosshairs of various investigative agencies.

The commissioned IAS officer was one of the key officers during the Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) regime. He was selected for the post of district collector among many bureaucrats.

The officer was summoned for questioning in the land case

After Congress came to power, the IAS officer was transferred as Joint Secretary to Government, AH, DD&F Department. However, it should be noted that he was summoned to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for questioning in a land case related to Ranga Reddy district.

Meanwhile, there was another complaint against Amoy Kumar.

The Madhura Nagar Plot Owners Welfare Association has filed a complaint with the ED Joint Director against Amoy Kumar, accusing him of fraudulently altering revenue records worth Rs 1,000 crore at Nos. 108, 109, 110 and 111 of Tatti Annaram Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal (formerly part of Hayathnagar Mandal). Rangareddy District.

The land was sold decades ago

The land has already been converted into more than 800 plots and sold to various people through registered sale deeds decades ago – already registered as plots in the revenue returns. In his complaint, association vice-president Raghidi Laxma Reddy said that initially one Suraya Yar Jung was the pattadar of land measuring 104.12 guntas in plot numbers 63, 68, 90, 91, 94, 95, 97, 98, 100, 101, 108, 109, 110 and 111 of Tatti Annaram village.

Subsequently, a mutation order was passed on 6th June, 1951, substituting the name of one Maddi Satyanarayana, son of Achi Reddy, as the pattadar of the said land. According to the said orders, the names of Maddi Satyanarayana Reddy and his brother Maddi Bala Reddy were recorded as pattadars and landholders bearing numbers 108 to 111 in 70.39 guntas in Pahana Khasra and subsequent pahanas. Neither Suraya Yar Khan nor his successors ever possessed the said land since then.

Ready plan of residential development

In 1980, Maddi Satyanarayana Reddy and Maddi Bal Reddy appointed one MV Ranga Chari as their attorney vide GPA Registered Deed No. 128 of 1980 dated 18th August, 1980, conferring on him various powers including power to alienate the above land. MV Ranga Chary, after obtaining exemption from the ULC authority, converted the above land into a residential layout comprising of over 800 plots under the name and style of Bhagya Lakshmi Nagar Colony after obtaining the sanctioned layout.

On February 5, 1981, he sold 130 plots developed under the said plan to the Radhakrishna Co-operative House Building Society under Sale Deeds Nos. 840/81, 841/81, 842/81, 843/81 and 844/81. He also sold 32 plots to Aruna Cooperative Housing Society under registered sale deeds bearing document numbers 631 of 1982 dated 28th January 1982 and 664/1982 dated 29th January 1982. In addition, the remaining plots were sold to various third parties through registered sale deeds.

“We have acquired some plots in the above plan from the original plot owners and we are in possession of the plots we have acquired. According to the fact that the above land was developed as a residential development, the then revenue authorities had already recorded this fact in the revenue returns by recording ‘plots’ under the head of plowed possession since 2000-01,” said Laxma Reddy.

“False, Speculative and Conspiratorial Claim”

In this connection, a person named Kamerunnisa Begum, daughter-in-law of Surai Yar Jung, in connivance with other members of her family, filed a “false, speculative and conspiratorial suit” for partition against them under No. 887 of 1987. file IV of Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in respect of various immovable properties including lands at village Tatti Annaram, concealing all the above facts. This lawsuit was dismissed on July 24, 1992. Against the said dismissal she filed CCCA No. 30 of 1993 in the High Court.

The vice president of the association also said that during the appeal process, the parties, ie the family members of Suray Yar Jung, entered into a compromise conspiracy and obtained a compromise decision, and their names were changed in the income statements behind the backs of the plot buyers in the form of orders. dated April 15, 2005 in proceedings No. B/1456/2004. Several persons aggrieved by the said mutation orders filed writ petitions in the High Court in WP Nos. 9944 of 200, 9946 of 2005, 11527 of 2005 and 11623/05.

The purchasers of the plots in the above plan formed an association named and styled Madhura Nagar Plot Owners Welfare Association and filed an appeal bearing case number A2/1990/2005 before the above variation orders were challenged by the appropriate authority. When the said appeal failed, they filed Writ Petition 13589 of 2005. However, the said writ petition was dismissed on June 24, 2005, ordering the authority to consider the appeal filed by the association.

The association’s appeal was rejected

The authorities subsequently dismissed the above appeal of the Madhura Nagar Plot Owners Welfare Association vide orders dated 2nd March, 2006, following which the said association filed a suit before the Joint Collector of Rangareddy District, which was dismissed on 12th December, 2008. .

Meanwhile, on the basis of the compromise decree of conspiracy and the fraudulent mutation orders obtained by them, the members of the family of Suray Yar Jung entered into deeds of conspiracy to sell in favor of Ammoda Developers and Promoters Pvt Ltd, represented by director B Mallaiah Yadav in respect of the above lands.

Ammoda Developers cannot claim the acquired lands

Even though sale deeds were executed in her favour, Ammoda Developers and Promoters did not get possession of the lands purportedly purchased by her as they are owned by the owners of the plots.

Further, it did not acquire any title under the said documents as the purported vendors themselves had no title to any portion of the above lands in the light of the facts set out above. However, on the basis of such fictitious, bogus and fraudulent sale deeds, the members of Ammoda Developers and Promoters started making efforts to arbitrarily grab the land owned by the plot owners.

“Papers obtained fraudulently”

Maddi Bhagyamma, Maddi Venkatamma, Maddi Srikanth Reddy and others claiming to be the legal heirs of Maddi Satyanarayana Reddy and Maddi Bala Reddy fraudulently obtained passport books and title deeds with the help of one K. Pratap Reddy and his sons in illegal way of suppressing the fact that the land had already been sold by their predecessors Madhura Nagar Plot Owners Association (2256/2004) long ago.

The same has been converted into residential layout as above, created through fictitious, fictitious and collusive registered sale deeds in favor of Taurus Homes Pvt Ltd, Cherika Laxma Reddy, son of Venkat Narasimha Reddy, K. Rajani, wife of K. Karunakar Reddy , C. Bharathi wife of Laxma Reddy, Medasani Anuradha wife of Rajaram Linga Reddy and N. Narottam Reddy son of Pratap Reddy in respect of some of the above lands. On the basis of such fictitious and bogus documents, the purported purchasers along with their purported vendors filed a suit (D5/6593/2005) before the Joint Collector of Rangareddy District challenging the mutation orders passed in favor of the legal heirs of Suray Yar. Jung.

FIR against K Pratap Reddy

However, in a submission dated 14 May 2007 addressed to District Collector Ranga Reddy and Tahsildar Hayatnagar Mandal vide letter (A/862/2003) dated 4 April 2007 to SHO Hayat Nagar PS, it was categorically stated that the passbooks and documents the title relied upon by Maddi Bhagyamma and others were not issued in accordance with law and were fraudulently obtained. An FIR was registered against K Pratap Reddy and his sons at PS, Hayathnagar and the said K Pratap Reddy was actually arrested by the concerned police.

Realizing that the fraud committed by them had been exposed, Maddhi Bhagyamma and her family members sought to withdraw the above revision case. However, Taurus Homes sought revision before the Joint Collector.

Ultimately, the said revision petition was also dismissed on 12th December, 2008.

Aggrieved by the same, Taurus Homes filed a Writ Petition (4989 of 2009) and the Court disposed of it vide order dated 08.04.2009 quashing the modification orders passed by the MRO in favor of the legal heirs of Suray Yar Jung and remanded the matter to the tasildar for new consideration.

Remanding the case, the Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Hayat Nagar, passed orders dated 27th June, 2012, ignoring the objections of various parties, including the plot owners and the Plot Owners Association, Madhura Nagar, which exceeded its powers and jurisdiction, passed orders on that the Subordinate Lands are the lands of Patta Nawab Askar Jung, father of Suray Yar Jung. Aggrieved by the said orders, Madhura Nagar Plot Owners Welfare Association has filed an appeal before this authority and it is pending.

Criminal statement

The members of the said association also filed a criminal case against K. Pratap Reddy and his sons, Maddi Bhagyamma and her children and others. An FIR (114 of 2019) has been registered against them by Hayathnagar PS on 1st March 2019, investigation is on.

In addition, writ petitions numbered 25102/12, 26853/12 and 40594/15 have been filed by various plaintiffs and are pending. On the basis of the above illegal orders of the Tahsildar Hayatnagar, the legal heirs of Surai Yar Jung are trying to get the pattadar pass books and title deeds in their favour.

Scope of the ROR Act

Maddi Bhagyamma and others who were allegedly involved in the earlier scam are also going to great lengths to get pattadar passbooks and title deeds in their favour. Both the parties deliberately and unjustifiably concealed the fact that the lands bearing Nos. 108-111 had already been sold and converted into residential development by the pattadars Maddi Satyanarayan and Maddi Bal Reddy through their duly constituted advocate MV Ranga Chari who sold the portion of the plot to various parties and that more than 800 people currently own and use their respective plots.

Once the land was developed, it fell outside the ambit of the ROR Act and all the aforesaid subsequent mutation proceedings and other proceedings initiated by the various petitioners in the revenue authorities, alleging that the aforesaid lands are agricultural lands, are null and void ab initio and unsustainable. Further, once the lands have been converted into non-agricultural land, there is no question of issuing any pattadar passbooks or title deeds in respect of the said lands. If such documents are released, it will cause chaos, leading to multiple lawsuits.

According to him, the Ranga Reddy District Special Tribunal Amoy Kumar in Case No. ST/D5/75/2021 (formerly A2/5849/2012) dated February 8, 2021 passed the orders without any notice to the Madhura Nagar Plot Owners Association.