My reception | Australian security lies in defense of the country, does not challenge China

Wargongers from the press of Rupert Murdock and defenders funded by “thought”, such as the Australian Institute of Strategic Policy, were predictably armed.

Chinese naval drills conducted in the Tasman Sea between Australia and New Zealand last month were denied as “unprecedented” as well as an unjustified act of “intimidation” and “provocation”.

The consensus is that Australia is a call for awakening to strengthen its defenses, from the development of more sophisticated drones to the best radars and other systems of detecting forward.

It is probably correct that Kanberra needs to strengthen internal defense. Apparently, they slept at the wheel responsible for protecting their country, because, according to some reports, it was the commercial pilots that warned the power of the Navy.

However, Australia acknowledged that the Chinese warned them a couple of hours before. Canberra may be angry with his military than Beijing.

You wonder whether China was not responsible for joint naval exercises conducted between Japan, Australia and New Zealand in September, in the Taiwan Strait and the South Chinese Sea, not to mention countless so-called so-called freedom of navigation.

When the navy continues to swim up and down along the current coastlines, it can also be perceived as “intimidation” and “provocation”.