Justin Baldoni’s lawyer explains the victim’s victim’s comment

Justin Baldoni’s lawyer Brian Friedman appealed to the use of the word “victim” against the background of the current claim between his client and Blake Lively.

Friedman appeared in the city podcast on Thursday to discuss the legal battle caused by Lively’s accusations of sexual harassment and retribution – Clayls Baldoni denies – while referring to her confrontation against Lively, which she also denies.

During the trial on March 6, Friedman stated that no one “intends to harm Ms. Lively in any way” and defended the Baldoni, saying: “My clients have the right to defend themselves. This is in no way abused.”

On Bellon’s podcast, he pressed Friedman on his wording, asking, “Does this mean that you agree that Blake is a victim here?”

Friedman replied: “I really think that many people are victims.”

He continued, referring to other parties, named in various complaints: “I think Justin is a victim here, I think Melissa Nathan is a victim. I think Jed Wallace is a victim. I think Jen Abel is a victim.

The latter development follows that, although Lively has ensured a protective order in this case, it does not fully protect the legal battle from public control.

Despite the gossip star, 37 years old, having received a modified protective order by a federal judge on Thursday, Dailymail.com learned that the court had limited the amount of restrictions she was looking for.

Although both former, it ends with the commands of the US Costaries, will be able to assign some sensitive material, which will be limited only for “lawyers” only “(AEO), ultimately, if the case goes to trial, it is unlikely that the court will” seal or otherwise provide confidential treatment “for any.

This means that as long as the actress and the 41 -year -old actress and Baldona are out of court, “very few secrets” will remain hidden and “will still go out in court.”

According to PeopleJudge Lewis J. Lyman has decided that the materials protected by lawyers, only the designation of the eyes “can only be used if their disclosure” is likely to cause significant business, commercial, financial or confidentiality. ”

As for the latest legal renewal, Baldoni’s lawyer, Brian Friedman, said Dailymail.com: “We fully agree with the court’s decision to provide a narrow amount of protection to such categories as private mental health records and personal security measures that are never interested in us, as opposed to the fact that Ms. Laivli exceeds.

He continued: “We remain focused on the necessary communications that are directly contrary to the unreasonable accusation of Ms. Lively.”

Friedman also stated that he and his team would continue to “resist any efforts of Ms. Lively and her team to prevent the ability of his clients to protect against her attacks, incorrectly classifying important information as” commercial secret “, especially given that there were no problems in providing these communications.

Meanwhile. Lively’s press secretary stated Dailymail.com: “Today the court rejected the objection of the extent parties and entered the defense necessary to ensure the free flow of the materials of the opening without any risk of intimidation of witnesses or the harm to the safety of any person. With this order, Ms. Lively moves in the process.

Last week, Lively’s lawyers argued that without proper Baldoni protection could tell the press about their security agreements and their medical information

She was also afraid of talking with friends of celebrities and her husband Ryan Reynolds, can leak, as well as details about her children.

Baldoni’s lawyers reflected and said that the idea that they would do it was “offensive” and said that Lively was asking for “another law” to protect their powerful and famous friends.

Only a week earlier, Lively asked the judge for a stronger protective order after receiving “violent” messages.

Both Baldoni and Lively have previously agreed to a protective order (PO), but the actress has now asked more protection instead of the “court model” order.

In a letter from Lively and Reynolds Judge Lewis J. Liman in New York received to people, the couple demanded “additional protection”.

This includes the category “Only for the Eyes of the Lawyer” (“AEO”).

This applies to “confidential materials for the identification of such a very confidential and personal, sensitive or corporate nature that the disclosure of such will probably cause competitiveness, business, commercial, financial, personal or privacy.”

The lawyers who submitted a letter to Blake and Ryan argued that (there is) “there is a good reason for the court to accept the proposed PO” and refer to the recently changed complaint of the star.

“As Mrs. Lively, Mrs. Lively, her family, other members of the acting role, various witnesses of facts and persons who have publicly expressed in support of Mrs. Lively, have received brutal, obscene, sexist and threatening communications.”

Justin’s legal team answered a new request for Blake in defense in the statement and said: “We do not indulge in dangerous rhetoric focused on someone, regardless of the situation.”

They also claimed that they received similar messages against the background of the current claim.

“Everyone who receives violent messages by anonymous parties is disgusting,” his team continued.

“When private parties mistakenly accused Lively and her paid team of unlawful actions, they received constant threats to death and visiting private homes where young children live …

“No one should face it, especially private parties that have no security for details.”

In December, Blake not only filed a lawsuit with Baldon, but also producer Jamie Hit, Wayfarer Studios Wayfarr Studios co -founder, Steve Sarovitz, crisis expert Melissa Nathan, Jed Wallace and his publicist Jennifer Abel.

Along with a lawsuit, $ 400 million against Lively, Justin also sues the New York Times $ 250 million in a slander claim after the publication reported Lively’s accusation.

In February, Blake changed his complaint and stated that two actresses would end with it, providing additional evidence to support her own accusations.

According to the Hollywood reporter, Jenny Schiter, who played the role of a fallisa in the adaptation of Kollin Hoover’s novel – has filed a complaint against Wayfarer Jamey Heath.

However, in his changed documents, Blake did not noticeably referred to the slate by name.

Spriter allegedly had a conversation with a hit because of her dissatisfaction with the apartment, which she rented in New -York among the shooting of her ending with us.

Jenny, who has a four -year -old daughter, explained that the space was not working, but felt that she could not find another place of residence because she was already destroying a deposit of $ 15,000.

Health allegedly proposed to compensate the actress lost deposit through Wayfarer’s studios so she could move to a new place.

But slate argued that he used a “language” that made her feel “inconvenient”, and the sources claimed “he intensively focused on the holiness of motherhood and the role of slice as a mother.”

After the interaction, Jenny filed a complaint to Sony – the distributor ends for him.

A separate source was informed by the Hollywood reporter that Jamie recalls that communication is very different from the memories of slate.

He also stated that the production company suggested that he was “weapons against them”.

She vitally filed a change in the complaint late on Tuesday night, arguing that two actresses on the set also had uncomfortable experiences with her, which ends with the US Director and the Star.

According to Blake spokesman, the complaint does not name the predictable victims or includes their texts or screenshots to protect their privacy.

“However, it is important that these victims have made Ms Lively to be allowed to share the changes in the changed complaint when they are presented, and they will testify and submit documents in the opening process,” the spokesman said.

The complaint is said to contain “significant modern evidence” that Blake was not one of the accusations of misconduct, as well as “confirmation of her original claims.”

He also reports that “evidence that describes in detail the threats, harassment and intimidation of” not only Blake, but “numerous innocent passers -by.”

In January, the judge planned the date of trial of his lawsuits in March 2026, and both parties had already decided to miss any mediation attempt.

Meanwhile, Justin’s lawyer stated that the accusation cost his client a considerable amount of work.