Blake Lively, Judge Justin Baldoni taught strict rules on confidential material

Blake Lively‘ A request for more stringent instructions for the release of confidential material in her permanent case with the director “It is running with us” and the Co-star Justin Baldoni was provided.

In the court documents obtained by Fox News Digital on Thursday, Judge Lewis Liman answered the Lively’s request “AEO) to evidence in evidence in Current caseThe provision of a modified order that is expected to “protect the confidentiality of certain non -state and confidential materials that will be exchanged in accordance with and during the opening” in this case.

“Attorneys’ designations should only be used only for confidential materials for the detection of such a very confidential and personal, sensitive, or own nature that the revelation of such probably causes considerable competitiveness, business, commercial, financial or confidentiality of the party produced.”

Blake Lively Vs. Justin Baldoni: All you need to know

Liman stated that a modified court order was granted because of the risk of “gossip” of spread between the two parties.

WhatThese cases Involve both business competing and sexual damage, – said Lyman in his court. The risk of disclosure is high. And the moving parties and Wayfarer parties have accused opposite parties to providing private, sensitive or confidential information for the media in their own business and personal preference in ways that cannot be easily traced. “

“The details of this case were carefully observed in the media, and each party accused the other in the case through the media,” the judge continued. “And where the confidential information is not disclosed to the media, it can be spread by gossip and disabled for those who are in a rigid artistic community, which can be harmful to one side or the other, but in such a way that it may not be easy and immediately detected.”

In a statement divided from Fox News Digital, the Lively press secretary stated that the actress “Another simple commitment” plans to “move” in the opening process, which “proves its claim” in court.

“Today, the court rejected the Wayfarer party and entered the defense necessary to ensure the free flow of the opening materials without any risk of intimidation of witnesses or the harm to the safety of any person. With this existing order, Ms Lively will move forward in the opening process to obtain even more evidence, which states.”

Baldoni’s lawyerBrian Friedman, said Fox News Digital that the actor and his team were satisfied with the court decision.

“We fully agree with the court’s decision to provide a narrow amount of protection to such categories as private mental health records and personal safety measures that are never interested in us, unlike the excessive demand of Ms. Lively, who rightly canceled,” Friedman said.

“We remain focused on the necessary communications that are directly contrary to Ms Lively’s unfounded accusation,” he added. “We will be against any effort to Ms. Lively and her team to prevent our customers from defending her attacks, incorrectly classifying important information as a” commercial secret “, especially given that there were no problems in providing these communications in New York Times.”

Last week, Lively’s lawyers claimed the appointment of AEO to evidence in this case seemingly insisting on text messages with “loud persons” that remain hidden from the public.

“There is a significant probability of irreparable harm if marginal conversations with loud persons that are not relevant to this case must get into other people’s hands,”-argument Lively’s lawyer, Maryl Conant, arguments at the hearing that hangs a chance to leak into texts.

How do you read? Click here to get more entertainment news

Friedman pushed away from the designation of AEO, declaring his concern that the legal team of Lively moved the burden to defense. He also confirmed that there was no intention to disclose any information on Lively’s medical and psychological records.

Lively and others who spoke in support of the actress received a “brutal” message leading a star of “gossip” to demand “enhanced” protection, according to a letter filed in court on February 20, and received Fox News Digital.

“As Mrs. Lively, Mrs. Lively, her family, other members of the acting role, various witnesses and persons who have publicly expressed in support of Ms Lively, received brutal, obscene, sexist and threatening communications,” the application said.

See: New Fox Nation Special Studies Legal Battle between Black Lively and Justin Baldoni

Baldoni’s legal team He answered Lively’s request for “enhanced protection” and confidentiality in court on the eve of the hearing on March 6.

“Given how actively lively parties have been published and considered Ms. Lively’s claims in the media, we are now surprised to learn how cruelly she wants to prevent the public with access to materials and relevant evidence,” the answer said.

Blake Lively sues Justin Baldoni for sexual harassment, revenge and causing emotional troubles

In December, Lively filed his claim Against Baldona and movie producer Jamie Hit for sexual harassment, revenge and emotional suffering. She first filed a complaint with the California Department of Civil Rights, and subsequently filed in the Federal Court in December.

In response to Baldoni filed A claim of $ 400 million Against Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds, accusing them of civilian extortion and defamation.

In addition to the issue of the web -site, which details the times of the events that have taken place, the Baldoni team also shared Not edited frames From the set “It ends with us”. Both Lively and Baldoni have stated that the personnel strengthen their appropriate claims.

After release, the Lively legal team demanded from Baldoni’s lawyer.

Click here to register in the entertainment bulletin

“Since Ms Lively’s lawyer has repeatedly tried cautiously Mr. Friedman, federal lawsuits should be conducted in court and in accordance with the relevant rules of professional behavior,” the court’s documents read. “His behavior threatens, and the will, which significantly regrets both a lively case and a Wayfarer case, breaking the jury’s pool, since his statements are deliberately aimed at undermining” character, trust, (and) the reputation of “numerous relevant parties.”

On January 23, Baldoni’s attorneys were answered, calling an attempt at the Livoel Order on “intimidation tactics” and “tactical skills of games”.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Lauryn Curnultz Fox News Digital contributed to this report.